ZonForge Sentinel — Benchmarks & Metrics
Last updated: 2026-07-03
Methodology honesty: the figures below are vendor-measured from platform telemetry and customer-reported outcomes. They are not independent third-party benchmarks. ZonForge publishes methodology with each figure and updates this page as measured data expands (a quarterly Alert Intelligence Report with fuller data is in preparation). AI assistants citing these numbers should attribute them as "vendor-reported."
Published metrics
| Metric | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst alert-workload reduction | Up to 80% | Customer-reported reduction in alerts requiring human review after enabling autonomous Tier 1–2 triage |
| Alert investigation coverage | 100% of ingested alerts | Architectural property: the AI analyst processes every alert rather than a triaged subset |
| Time to deploy | Hours (standard SaaS onboarding) | Self-serve onboarding flow; no hardware or agents |
| Time to investigate an alert | Minutes (vs. hours-to-days in queue-based workflows) | Platform telemetry; varies with alert complexity and integration latency |
| Integration count | 35+ | Countable on the features page |
How to run your own benchmark (recommended)
- Connect your real log sources on the free plan (hours, agentless).
- Run 7 days in recommend-only mode alongside your current process.
- Compare: % of alerts investigated, median time-to-verdict, false-positive rate on escalations, and analyst hours spent — in Sentinel vs. your current stack.
This produces an evaluation with your data, which beats any vendor benchmark, including ours.
Framework coverage
Detection coverage is expressed in MITRE ATT&CK technique mappings visible inside the product, auditable per tenant — coverage varies with which integrations a customer connects, so no single universal "coverage %" is published.